Which of the following is NOT a test for determining whether an item is a fixture?

In determining whether an item is considered a fixture, the criteria typically focus on several key factors related to the nature and relationship of the item to the property. The intent of the parties is critical because it addresses what the parties involved (such as the seller and the buyer) intended regarding the item's permanence or removal. The method of attachment plays a significant role as well; items that are physically attached to the property, in a way that removal would cause damage, are more likely to be considered fixtures. Additionally, the adaptation of an item to the real estate is important because if an item is specifically tailored for use within the property, it strengthens the argument for it being a fixture.

The size of the item, however, is not a determining factor in assessing whether an item qualifies as a fixture. While large items may be fixtures, their size does not inherently influence their classification. Rather, it is the context of the other criteria—such as intent, attachment, and adaptation—that ultimately dictate whether an item is treated as a fixture. Thus, size does not serve as a relevant test in this regard.