If a licensee represents a clear and immediate danger to the public, what can occur?

When a licensee poses a clear and immediate danger to the public, the appropriate response is to summarily suspend the license for a specified time, which in this case is ninety days. This provision is in place to protect public safety while allowing for further investigation. The summation of the license allows authorities to take quick action to mitigate any potential harm that the licensee's continued practice could cause.

The measure of a ninety-day suspension is meant to provide sufficient time for an investigation or hearing to take place without exposing the public to risks. This reflects the responsibility of the regulatory body to act decisively in situations where public danger is evident.

Other options reflect alternative actions that would either lack the necessary immediacy to protect the public or imply a lack of response. For instance, ordering a hearing within seven days could be too slow in circumstances where a clear threat is present. Likewise, claiming that no action can be taken fails to prioritize public safety. Lastly, placing the licensee under arrest may not be appropriate unless there are criminal activities involved, which falls outside the scope of professional licensing procedures. Thus, the summarily suspension stands as the most effective and relevant action in response to the immediate danger posed by the licensee.